Asymmetries of Daily Life

How often do you think of asymmetries? I think about them all the time.

They're invisible rules that control your life. Most people never see them. But once you learn to spot these hidden imbalances, in your salary, your relationships, your career, you gain an unfair advantage.

Asymmetries are shortcuts to knowledge. They reveal why some people get rich while others stay poor, why certain companies innovate while giants stagnate, why your last relationship ended the way it did.

Asymmetries reward those who see them first.

Ancient Wisdom of Loss

The ancients deeply understood the importance of recognizing asymmetry. The greatest philosophers were, at heart, asymmetry hunters.

Take, for example, the asymmetry that the loss feels greater than the gain feels good.

Livy famously wrote, "Men feel the good less intensely than the bad" (Segnius homines bona quam mala sentiunt, Ab Urbe Condita XXX.21.12).

This applies especially to financial loss. Have you noticed that when you lose money you are hurt significantly more than when you gain the same amount? I once had an uncle who lost $150,000 in the stock market during the 1980s, he was never the same again. Sometimes it can break people.

Seneca frequently writes about this particular asymmetry. Modern science agrees. "Bad is stronger than good," concluded Baumeister and colleagues in their influential paper.

Research consistently shows that negative events produce larger and longer-lasting effects than positive ones. Brain imaging reveals that our amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex show higher amplitude and longer activation for negative stimuli, even when matched for intensity.

Evolution wired us this way because missing a single threat could be fatal, while missing a single opportunity rarely is.

This creates the asymmetry of success.

The Asymmetry of Success

The more you have, the more you risk losing. You become fragile, continuously anxious about potential losses rather than enjoying additional gains. The wealthy person doesn't feel twice as good as when they had half the money, but they feel exponentially worse at the prospect of losing it.

The ancient story of Damocles captures this perfectly. Invited to experience a king's life, Damocles found himself unable to enjoy the feast because of the sword hanging over his head by a single thread.

Most of Seneca’s writings are about this. He was the richest man in the Roman empire at the time, and he constantly wrote about how possessions begin to possess us, how wealth becomes a source of anxiety rather than peace.

But wealth isn't required for this asymmetry. Middle-class workers do this too. Losing your job in America is traumatic. That’s because America can go from first world country to third world country depending on your income level. In response to this, middle class workers reshape their personalities at work to avoid getting fired. They bite their tongues in meetings, laugh at bad jokes, and suppress their instincts, all to protect what they have.

This same fear of losing your job explains why big companies lose to up and coming new companies. Also why individual outsiders have the best ideas and why big organizations don't innovate.

Why Do Outsiders Innovate?

Large organizations struggle with innovation. for the simple, reason that failure carries severe consequences (job loss) while success typically offers only modest rewards. This imbalance promotes an environment of "safe mediocrity," stifling originality and creativity.

This is "defensive decision-making," as Gerd Gigerenzer describes. Consider the psychology at work. If you make a conventional decision that fails spectacularly, you can point to your solid reasoning and keep your job. But propose something counterintuitive, even if it might be superior on average, and failure becomes a career-ending mistake. The blame falls squarely on you for deviating from accepted wisdom.

This explains why doctors over-prescribe tests and treatments. It’s not because patients need them, but because it's safer to do something than risk being sued for doing nothing. Managers schedule endless meetings to diffuse responsibility rather than make decisive calls. Procurement departments choose the Big Four accounting firms not because they're objectively better, but because "nobody gets fired for buying IBM”

This asymmetry explains why breakthrough innovation so often comes from outsiders, entrepreneurs who aren't trapped in risk-averse institutional thinking. They face different incentives entirely. For them, playing it safe is often the bigger risk.

The individuals drawn to this uncertain terrain are self-selected for risk-taking, creativity, and ambition. Those comfortable with routine and caution rarely leave the security of big organizations; instead, innovators seek environments where upside is incentivized more than the downside.

The Relationship Asymmetry

Now, apply this lens to love.

Consider relationships. Every man in a relationship quickly learns the asymmetry of communication.

Subscribe to Premium to read the rest.