What Hercules Knew

I’ve been reading Herakles (“Hercules”) and his 12 Labors recently. Do people still read about Herakles? Is his tales still in the modern collective consciousness? I suppose so, via Disney, Percy Jackson, or basic mythology classes. But most people today would struggle to name even one of his twelve labors or what they mean. Yet these stories contain survival wisdom more relevant now than ever before.

In truth, we’ve traded our cultural inheritance for superhero franchises and CGI spectacles. Which is a shame, because while superhero movies make for fine entertainment, they are not a replacement for the old tales. it's a genuine loss. The ancient myths weren't sanitized children's stories. They were practical manuals for navigating a hostile world.

And really, the labors of Herakles stands apart from most of the old myths. The tales of Herakles are extraordinarily ancient. By Homer’s day (c. 750 BC) his labors were already common lore, copied and re-copied by classical poets, hellenistic encyclopedists, roman storytellers, medieval scribes and modern universities.

Each labor presents a different type of challenge that requires a specific survival skill, a mental model for overcoming obstacles when conventional approaches fail. They are a manual of the skills necessary for a person going through life. They are useful and time tested.

The first labor reveals perhaps the most crucial lesson. The danger of total dependence on advanced tools.

Labor 1: The Nemean Lion

Eurystheus commanded Heracles to kill the Nemean Lion, a beast terrorizing the countryside around Nemea.

It is no surprise that such a lion would form for the young Heracles the first of his great challenges. Historically, lions were a genuine threat throughout western Asia. Throughout the ancient Near East, lions posed genuine threats to human survival. The Mesopotamian god Ninurta killed the Lion, the terror of the gods. Enkidu and Gilgamesh routinely battled lions in their epic adventures. The biblical Samson tore one apart with his bare hands.

Herodotus records that lions in northern Greece attacked Xerxes' massive army, mauling the camels carrying his supplies. Aristotle and Pliny the Elder confirm lions inhabited the region well into the classical period. The lion-slaying motif endured across cultures precisely because it represented humanity's struggle against apex predators that could, and regularly did, kill us. Look at the map of the historical range of lions

The Nemean Lion was worse than an ordinary lion. Its hide was impervious to all weapons, rendering conventional tools useless. Here lay the perfect trap for any hero: a problem that couldn't be solved with superior technology.

Herakles arrived armed with bronze arrows and an iron sword—peak technology of his era. These weapons represented centuries of metallurgical advancement, forged by master craftsmen and proven in countless battles. Yet every arrow bounced harmlessly off the lion's hide. Every sword strike failed. If Herakles had possessed no skills beyond wielding weapons, the lion would have devoured him.

Instead, Herakles abandoned his arsenal and reverted to tactics and strategy. He cornered the lion in a cave with two entrances, blocked one with stones, and confronted the beast bare-handed through the other. He succeeded by choking it to death—then used the lion's own claws to flay its impenetrable hide.

Even dead, the lion posed a problem, conventional tools still couldn't penetrate its hide. Herakles solved this by using the lion's own claws to flay the creature. When he returned wearing the lion-skin as armor. The lion-skin became a walking testament to the failure of advanced weaponry and the triumph of adaptive thinking.

A key lesson emerges from this labor. The Reversion Advantage.

Reversion Advantage

We often view competence as a linear path. Master the basics, adopt advanced tools, and leave fundamentals behind as obsolete. But consider Herakles. His legendary strength wasn't just in wielding bronze weapons it also lay equally in his ability to fight bare-handed, think tactically, and adapt to his environment. He mastered metallurgy without sacrificing the primal skills technology couldn't replace.

True advancement sometimes requires strategic regression. You need to ensure you can function when progress fails you. True resilience lies in preserving the profound power to step back. This is the practical philosophy within the myth. Herakles secured the first key to unlocking immortality. Mastering the art of optionality. Skill that survives the power outage

Don’t let dating apps numb the reflex that makes your pulse spike when you lock eyes with a stranger across the bar. Don’t off-load your judgment to the algorithm that tells you what to watch, what to wear, who to love. Don’t ride so many Ubers that a network outage leaves you unable to read the street grid under your own feet.

Keep the sword, but don’t forget how to fight with tactics and fists.

In This Newsletter

Let’s analyze a few more of his labors to see what practical skills are being displayed. Each Labor hides a different survival principle

1) Labor 2-The Hydra: Systems thinking

2) Labor 6-The Stymphalian Birds: Crowd-psychology

4) Labor 12-Cerberus: Find the decision maker

5) Labor 4-The Erymanthian Boar: Change the environment

The Many Headed-Hydra

In the marshes near Lerna lived a serpent with many heads. Classical writers vary on the number, three, six, nine, “uncountable”, but all stress the same rule, sever a head, and two surge back. Herakles discovered this regeneration rule the hard way. Every sword stroke that severed a head triggered the growth of two replacements. Each success doubled his problem.

His nephew Iolaus provided the solution. As Herakles severed each head, Iolaus immediately cauterized the neck with a torch. Fire introduced the missing element, negative feedback that stopped the regeneration loop. They removed the immortal head, buried it under a massive stone.

When you treat Herakles × Hydra as a case study in complex systems that retaliate, the scene stops being monster-movie and starts reading like an early chapter in systems thinking

The Hydra operates on positive feedback, every direct attack injects energy back into the system, producing more of what you're trying to eliminate. This amplifying loop has no internal brakes. Modern systems display identical behavior: Think about bank runs. Withdrawals trigger panic. Panic triggers more withdrawals. Each person fleeing the bank validates the next person's decision to flee. Think about social media outrage. Each retweet expands the audience, providing fuel for the next wave of retweets. The story grows not because it becomes more true, but because it becomes more visible.

Attacking surface effects amplifies the underlying problem. You need a circuit breaker, something that interrupts the feedback loop entirely. Iolaus's torch wasn't stronger than Herakles' bronze sword; it operated on a different variable. Heat added an external constraint that the heads couldn't circumvent, converting an open loop into a controlled one.

In systems language: introduce a response that runs inverse to the runaway signal.

Beware interventions that linearly attack a nonlinear system. If feedback is positive, every clean slice risks doubling the problem.

Quarantine what you can’t kill. Isolate the immortal head before it seeds the loop again.

The Stymphalian Birds

Subscribe to Premium to read the rest.